On the Love of Learning and the Desire for God by Monsignor Ferrarese

There is an oft-quoted thought about the Gospels and the Church: “Jesus taught adults and blessed children, but in the Church today, we teach children and bless adults.” While this is without a doubt true, it sets up a false dichotomy: It is not an either/or question, but really a both/and one! Learning is necessary at every stage of our development.

At one point in the Gospels, Jesus emphatically made this point. He said: “As for you, do not be called ‘Rabbi.’ You have but one teacher, and you are all brothers… Do not be called ‘Master’; you have but one master, the Messiah (Matt. 23:8,10).” This fits nicely with the great tradition of Judaism regarding the study of the Torah and the accumulated wisdom that eventually became the Talmud. Jews, it is often said, are taught to question, for in questioning one becomes a true learner; for it is in questioning that we make our own the need to learn more and hence to grow.

Unfortunately, this license to question has not always been part of our Catholic tradition. This is mainly grounded in an important distinction: there is a questioning born of respect and reverence of tradition, and then there is the philosophical questioning which is born of skepticism or even the need to disprove the truths of tradition. To be a learner in the ways of faith, one must always approach religious questions with the respect of the Rabbis, not with a deconstructuralist desire of the philosophers to take apart reality and, even more, that of the skeptics who are merely interested in trying to prove religion to be wrong, useless and even dangerous!

I distinctly remember a question I raised in my fifth grade class: if God wanted to have us be happy with Him forever in heaven, why did He not just put us there in heaven? Why all this struggle here on earth? To this day, I think it was a good question. But my teacher took me to task for even asking the question. She gave me no answer, only a feeling of shame at having asked it. It was only in the seminary that I had that question answered: God wanted us to learn here on earth how to be good and to freely choose to love Him in return. The question was good and I am glad that I had the adult learning of the seminary to teach me.

But many Catholics think that once they have received Confirmation, their learning about the faith has ended. Learning is lifelong! An adult Catholic that does not seek to learn more about their faith has ceased to engage one-on-one with God, which is His preeminent desire for each of us. To love God must mean to learn more about God. If it does not lead to more learning, it is not really love. While classrooms and Adult Education courses are clearly not the only way God continues to teach us, they are important paths that God can use to feed what must be a hunger for learning. If we don’t want to learn more about God, are we really expressing our love for Him in the best way we can?

We have tried here in our parish to provide a multitude of opportunities for a person to grow as an adult Christian: the lecture series (8 so far), film festivals (18), Pastoral Institute Courses, parish retreats (8), Bible studies, Arise discussion groups, Opera workshops (5), Pilgrimages (4), RCIA courses; not to mention scores of Baptism, Marriage and first-sacrament Parent courses. I challenge anyone to find another parish that has done more to educate the adult Catholic! But while our attendance at Sunday Masses averages between 1500 and 2000 individuals (including children), attendance at our Adult Education offering is just a fraction of this. Now, a person’s work schedule and parenting responsibilities does prevent a lot of adults from making use of these opportunities. But I cannot help believing that there are some adult Catholics who just don’t see the need to keep learning about their faith.

This lack of hunger for learning is not a good sign in an adult Christian.

But the Lord, over and over, urges us against discouragement. So we continue to provide opportunities for growth that make adults better Catholics. There are many in our parish that do hunger to learn more and who do take advantage of the feast offered each year for growth in an adult-Catholic faith. The cheer on their faces as well as the words of thanks at these events sustains my hope that, more and more, adults in our parish may choose to continue to learn about their faith and to deepen it!

Posted in Msgr. Ferrarese | Leave a comment

Pecking Order by Monsignor Ferrarese

For many, the recent royal wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle was a storybook moment, a fairy tale that hints at an enchanted world where we can all be seen as Princes and Princesses. As we imagine ourselves in the place of these figures of privilege, we can for a brief moment dream of the specialness of who we are. But it is all a mirage: we are who we are. And in God’s eyes there is no royalty. Each of us is unique and special to the all Powerful and all Knowing.

But it is a very human, and some would say ‘natural,’ thing to see all of life in a hierarchical pattern. (There are some that say that this way of seeing life is very much bound up with male patriarchal modes of understanding, but we leave this to the sociologists to hammer out!) In most communities and social entities, there is this principle that divides us and forms a clearly defined sense of who is on top and who is on the bottom.

I remember as a kid we used to play a game called ‘King of the Hill’. One of the gang proclaimed himself King of the hill, usually on some mound in an empty lot! He was then physically attacked by the rest of us until we pulled him down and one of the other members who clawed their way to the top yelled at the top of his voice: “I am King of the hill!” Unfortunately, this futile and violent game is carried out in many fields of endeavor with a more genteel veneer, but with the same violent intent (e. g. Academic institutions, corporations, work places, even the Church!).

This rat race of competition is the product of envy and the insecurities of life. We think that we are deficient and we revolt against this by trying to prove our superiority. It’s crazy, but this is the terrible development of envy. Envy was the first sin when the devil convinced Eve and Adam that they were being kept in a deficient mode by God who did not want them to be equal to Himself. So they ate the forbidden fruit. Their son Cain followed the same fatal logic and could not abide his brother Abel so he killed him. Envy is so elemental a sin that even animals will get jealous if you show affection to some other animal or even a human being!

The Chosen People were conceived by God as a Kingdom of priests. Everyone was equal before God who was the only King. But they were, you guessed it, envious of other nations, and so they asked God for a king even though God warned them of what they were giving up. Notwithstanding the person of King David, Kingship was not a happy experience for the Jews.

Even the Apostles succumbed to this temptation. They argued who was the greatest. The mother of the Zebedee boys actually tried to run an ‘end play’ (with I am sure the approval of her sons!) by going to Jesus and asking that James and John be given preference over the other ten apostles when Jesus formed his revolutionary government (Matthew 20:20-28); boy was she off the mark! Predictably, the other ten were not amused. Jesus, whose patience began to wear thin, had to call a special meeting to tell them that they have His kingdom completely wrong. The last shall be first. Period. This concern for the pecking order invades everything and it shows the countercultural power of Christ’s vision that even today is a disturbing but liberating view of seeing leadership.

Just in case the Apostles still did not get it, the night before He died, at the Last Supper, He gave them a prophetic action of what he means by this new community of His. He put a towel around His waist and did what only a slave would do in that culture: He washed the feet of his disciples.

Jesus was never ambiguous about this since He knew our tendencies to dismiss the difficult in what we learn: “I have given you a model to follow, so that as I have done for you, you should also do (John 13:15).” Earlier, when Mrs. Zebedee gave Him the aforementioned ‘teachable moment,’ he spoke about the pecking order in the pagan world and then acerbically and clearly stated: “But it shall not be so among you (Matthew 20:26).” Could Jesus get any clearer?

The pecking-order mentality permeates all cultures and is responsible for many wars and other more personal strifes, especially in families.

The saints like Francis and Thérèse understood the liberating joy of going to the last place. What freedom! To give up the fight to the top and the resentments it builds and only to taste the freedom that the great King Lear felt when he was reunited with his beloved Cordelia! Lear found that even prison could be paradise when love destroys the constant quest for domination and control!

It seems that only the saints and the poets understand this!

Posted in Msgr. Ferrarese | Leave a comment

Bede the Venerable

Bede the Venerable

Today the Church celebrates the feast of St. Bede the Venerable, priest and doctor, who lived during the 7th & 8th centuries in the Kingdom of Northumbria in northeast England.  He is recognized as the greatest Anglo-Saxon scholar; his knowledge covering many different disciplines, history, theology, linguistics, etc.

Bede entered the Benedictine monastery of St. Peter located on the River Wear when he was seven to be educated; this was a common practice during this time.  He evidently stayed with the Benedictine Order and was eventually ordained a priest.

Bede wrote a number of influential documents the most famous was Ecclesiastical History of the English People.

His bones were translated (moved) to Durham Cathedral in the 11th century.  Try this link: https://www.durhamworldheritagesite.com/history/bede

In 1899 Pope Leo XII named his Doctor of the Church.

By the way, he is called venerable not because of his canonization but because of his life of holiness.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Beauty Matters by Monsignor Ferrarese

Just recently, a show opened at the Metropolitan Museum called “Heavenly Bodies” in which the beauty of the habits and clothing of the Catholic Imagination are appreciated and celebrated, and where it is shown how they have given inspiration to the great clothing designers of the Western world. We take the distinctiveness of our vestments and habits for granted, and the fact that they are beautiful in both form and function. Even soldiers dedicated to protecting the Pope had their uniforms designed by Michelangelo! Yes, those Swiss Guards in their flamboyant clothing had possibly the greatest artist of the West as their designer!

But that is just one example.

The Church has inspired artists of all genres for centuries. Painting (Michelangelo, Da Vinci), Architecture (the great Gothic Cathedrals, the Baroque of the Eternal city, the modern masterpiece of Sagrada Familia in Barcelona), Sculpture (Michelangelo again, Rodin), literature (Dante, Cervantes) to just name some of the arts influenced directly by the Church.

But what can one say about the beauty of the Moral Life, such as the theological grandeur of the “Summa Theologiae” of St. Thomas Aquinas!

It is only right that there be such beauty connected with the Church! After all, look at our God, the Creator of the Universe: Beauty all around! The beauty of the celestial spheres, the smile of a baby, the sleek swiftness of felines, the majesty of the ocean, the breathtaking view of the mighty mountains. One does not have to go far to see that beauty is not just an add-on, but also an essential part of what it means to be human.

I remember talking with a parishioner in Brooklyn who had done his Ph.D. dissertation on the effects of architecture on incarcerated or otherwise detained people. He told me that there was evidence that when a prison was built with beauty and light predominating, people were more easily restored to productive reconnection with society. In one instance, an architect took the medieval monastery as his guide and model for the design of a prison. In this prison (I believe near the ocean), there were plenty of beautiful views and sunlight filling the corridors. This environment produced fewer incidents of violence than the normal prison, which was dark and forbidding.

When Dostoyevsky tried to delineate what was it about Christ that was salvific, he said something like this: His beauty will save us!

For many people, the beauty of an experience seems just an extra. That an action is good or just or true seems like more a necessity. But the great Catholic theologian Hans Urs von Balthasar wrote a seven-volume work entitled “The Glory of the Lord” using the biblical category of glory for what we call beauty. He felt the demotion of beauty in Western theological thought was a costly error in reasoning. To banish beauty from theology (suspect because of the sensual delight that it evokes) was a disastrous error of modern thought.

One sees this especially in the Orthodox spirituality of the Icon, a beautiful work of art that is ‘painting in prayer’ and evokes in the believer a connection with the Divine. This beauty is intimately connected with Truth, since the painting of the icon is an act of faith in a reality that is present in truth. This was curiously expounded one day by, of all people, Nancy Reagan! She was in Moscow with the President, her husband, and was being shown around a museum by Raissa Gorbachov, wife of the Soviet Premier. They were both admiring a group of Russian icons. But the Russian woman, Raissa, an avowed Atheist, praised the icons’ composition and beautiful colors. Mrs. Reagan, a believer, quipped, “But, you know, they do mean something!” She was attuned to what the beauty pointed to, while her hostess was prevented from seeing this by her lack of faith.

This connection between beauty and faith came home to me one day when I was visiting the Metropolitan Museum of Art. As often happens to me in a museum, I got tired of all the works of art I was seeing. With time and fatigue, my powers of appreciation diminished. On that day, I felt a need for prayer and I caught sight of an ancient icon of Christ. It moved me to prayer. So I found an isolated place to sit within view of a number of sacred works of art and I began to pray. I sort of felt that I was doing the forbidden in that place, but that God was pleased that all those beautiful works of art were being used for the purpose for which they were created: to lead people to God. There I was in that public space doing in private what was forbidden to do in public: prayer. And it was beauty that led me there!

All that is beautiful, not only art, can lead us to God. Even the earth and all that is beautiful within it can lead us to prayer. Beauty matters!

Posted in Msgr. Ferrarese | Leave a comment

The Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of the Church

The Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of the Church

Pope Francis has created a new Marian liturgical celebration, the Blessed Virgin Mary, Mother of the Church.  It is to be celebrated the Monday after Pentecost.

This new celebrates Mary, her presence at Pentecost and the birth of the Church, and her continued maternal care for us, the present-day Church.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

What does the Pentecost Event have to do with the Church today?

What does the Pentecost Event have to do with the Church today?

Many individuals might question why an event that occurred about 2,000 years ago can have any impact or meaning for us today.  Well, to me Pentecost can …

1. The Pentecost Event shows us what it truly means to be a Christian.

The word Christian does mean “Christ-like”.  Being a Christian means following Jesus and accepting his teaching, but it also means evangelization.  Evangelization may not mean vocal preaching, necessarily, but it does involve embodying and living out those principles that Jesus showed us and taught us.  As Lumen Gentium states: “Therefore in the Church, everyone whether belonging to the hierarchy, or being cared for by it, is called to holiness…” (#39).  We are ALL called to participate in the life and mission of the Church, whatever our talents and abilities are or wherever they lie. (Prager)

2. The Pentecost Event shows us how we, as Church, can deepen our faith.

The early Christian community “…devoted themselves to the teaching of the apostles and to the communal life, to the breaking of the bread and to the prayers.” (New American Bible, Acts of the Apostles 2:42)  The Pentecost Event reveals how we can start to make our faith deeper and fuller: by educating ourselves in what the Church teaches and practices; by participating in the sacramental (communal) life of the Church, especially the Eucharist; and by developing a deeper and more vibrant prayer life. (Prager)

3. The Pentecost Event can enable us to “see” the activity of the Holy Spirit in the entire Church and the Spirit’s involvement in the Church’s mission.

The Holy Spirit is at work through all the baptized since we are all called to holiness (see #1 above).  The Holy Spirit enables the entire Church, using the myriad talents of the ordained and laity in tandem, to advance the mission of the Church:

From my perspective the Church’s mission is a vocation, a calling; all the baptized are called to “do something” and this “doing something” is composed of four parts:

  • Spreading the Good News of our salvation through Jesus; that through the Paschal Mystery we have been saved, we can achieve eternal life.
  • Being a prophetic voice to others, calling others to change their lives and lifestyles; the Church is called to have a counter-cultural impact.  We are supposed to run counter to much of what the prevailing culture often says is good, right or just.
  • Being a sign of Christ to others, being of service, ministering to others, as Jesus did; we’re supposed to be living out and embodying those values and principles that Jesus taught us and showed, by which Jesus lived.
  • Regular and active participation in the sacramental life of the Church, especially the Eucharist.   However, I would also say, for our time, the sacrament of Reconciliation is an important one, as well, depending on how one lives their life.

We have been called as Church to put this mission into action wherever our talents and abilities lie.  Some of the baptized can preach some cannot; some can teach others cannot, but we all have talents that can be utilized to advance the Church’s mission.  For most of the faithful, it most likely lies in how we live our lives on a daily basis at home with our family, in interaction with our neighbors or at work with our colleagues. (Prager)  A lot will say what good can that do?  Well, those of us in “the real world” are often the only place that others can see positive examples of what it means to really be a Christian, that’s what it can do.

The one question we might want to ask ourselves is: Do others see Christ in my actions and in me?

As the Catechism of the Catholic Church, (CCC), states: “…to be in touch with Christ, we must first have been touched by the Holy Spirit. He comes to meet us and kindle faith in us.” (CCC, #683)

So not only are we an Easter people we’re also a Pentecost people, the two events are inexorably tied together – the Holy Spirit given to us by the risen Jesus continues to  guide and sanctify us as Church. (Prager)


The Catechism of the Catholic Church.  The Vatican, 06 Nov. 2002.  Web. 18 March.2016   < http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/_INDEX.HTM>

Lumen Gentium.  The Vatican, 06 Nov. 2002 Web. 25 March 2014 <http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19641121_lumen-gentium_en.html>

The New American Bible. The Vatican, 06 Nov. 2002.  Web. 12 Feb. 2014 <http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0839/_INDEX.HTM>

Prager, Edward.  My Intended to be but Never, Ever, Ever to be Published Tome.  n.p.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Solemnity of Pentecost

The Solemnity of Pentecost

“When the time for Pentecost was fulfilled, they were all in one place together. And suddenly there came from the sky a noise like a strong driving wind, and it filled the entire house in which they were. Then there appeared to them tongues as of fire, which parted and came to rest on each one of them. And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak in different tongues, as the Spirit enabled them to proclaim.

Now there were devout Jews from every nation under heaven staying in Jerusalem. At this sound, they gathered in a large crowd, but they were confused because each one heard them speaking in his own language. They were astounded, and in amazement they asked, ‘Are not all these people who are speaking Galileans? Then how does each of us hear them in his own native language? We are Parthians, Medes, and Elamites, inhabitants of Mesopotamia, Judea and Cappadocia, Pontus and Asia, Phrygia and Pamphylia, Egypt and the districts of Libya near Cyrene, as well as travelers from Rome, both Jews and converts to Judaism, Cretans and Arabs, yet we hear them speaking in our own tongues of the mighty acts of God.’   They were all astounded and bewildered, and said to one another, ‘What does this mean?’”  (New American Bible, Acts of the Apostles 2:1-12)

Pentecost was originally a feast of the Jewish faith that celebrated the giving of the Law at Mt. Sinai.  It occurred fifty days after Passover, hence the name Pentecost meaning fiftieth.

Pentecost is celebrated as a Christian feast because of the events that occurred fifty days after Jesus’ Resurrection: the descent of the Holy Spirit on those individuals that had gathered in the Cenacle, the Upper Room, and inaugurated the beginning of the Church. Pentecost is one of the three most important liturgical celebrations of the Church year.  It celebrates and commemorates the establishment of the Church which is why it is referred to it as the “Birthday of the Church”.

The Pentecost Event, as I call it in my text, My Intended to be but Never, Ever, Ever to be Published Tome, is an occasion that radically impacted and drastically changed the Apostolic Church.  Hiding behind locked doors and windows in fear of their lives, the descent of the Holy Spirit, the Paraclete, the Advocate, as promised by Jesus, transforms these individuals into people that boldly proclaimed the Gospel, the Good News of Jesus.


The Catechism of the Catholic Church.  The Vatican, 06 Nov. 2002.  Web. 18 March.2016   < http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/_INDEX.HTM>

Lumen Gentium.  The Vatican, 06 Nov. 2002 Web. 25 March 2014 <http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_const_19641121_lumen-gentium_en.html>

The New American Bible. The Vatican, 06 Nov. 2002.  Web. 12 Feb. 2014 <http://www.vatican.va/archive/ENG0839/_INDEX.HTM>

Prager, Edward.  My Intended to be but Never, Ever, Ever to be Published Tome.  n.p.


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Holy Spirit Is Not a Bird! by Monsignor Ferarrese

We can relate to the First Person of the Blessed Trinity because when we say ‘Father’ we have a clear and moving idea of what a Father is or should be. There is content to the word that inspires and communicates. Elements of ‘fatherhood’ give true and lasting meaning to our understanding of God. With regards to the Second Person of the Blessed Trinity, we use the word ‘logos’ or ‘word’ because the essential nature of the ‘logos’ is to communicate God to our limited understandings. Furthermore, as the Word is incarnate, we have the very accessible picture of Jesus of Nazareth in His birth (Christmas) and Passion & Resurrection (Holy Week-Easter) as one like us except without sin.

But when it comes to the Third Person of the Blessed Trinity, the Holy Spirit, the world of images breaks down. The Bible provides what seems like metaphors: a dove, tongues of flame, a mighty wind; all of which do not have the power of the image of God the Father and Jesus the Christ. Yet this advocate (literally a lawyer) speaks for us; defends us; offers decisions for us to make; prompts us to the good; comforts us; energizes us; teaches us; and is found both in the individual being of the believer and guides the entire Church in her inerrancy and direction toward the end point of all history, which the great Theologian Teilhard de Chardin calls the Omega Point who is Christ.

Clearly the images presented for the Holy Spirit only hint weakly at the magisterial power and, at the same time, the illusive reality of its Presence. The Holy Spirit is God in us, and the very principle and defining character of our vocation as Christians.

But He, She, It (there is no gender in the Holy Spirit!) is a person. This fact is often not acknowledged because the imagination has nothing to work with. This draws us into the very mystery of the Trinity. When we say that you or I are persons, we know what we mean. You and I have a central and unique ‘self’ that is separate from one another yet can experience moments of unity and integration; but we are essentially separate selves. When we speak of the Trinity as three persons in one God, we do not mean ‘persons’ in quite the same way. There is an organic unity there, but also a separateness that is more than one based on function: (the Father creates, the Son redeems, the Holy Spirit sanctifies), but includes function in its meaning. What we end up with is something like the persons that we are but also something unlike. You and I are not of one substance and we can disagree on things. This is not true of the persons of the Holy Trinity where Their unity is unbroken as is Their substance. Yet we can talk about the actions of the Logos in Jesus (Christology has its own difficulties) and also the decisions and the actions of the Spirit, which is the other ‘Advocate’ that Jesus and the Father send to us. The Spirit is the radically close presence of God within us and among us. The Spirit could not come until the Logos-Human Jesus ascended to the Father (remembering that ascending does not mean going up into the clouds!). So the earthly absence of the Son is essential to the presence of the Spirit yet They are One always with the Father!

The problem is that in talking about the Holy Spirit (Holy Ghost, in an earlier translation, had at least the idea inherent in it that this entity was like a person!), we often strip this third person of the Blessed Trinity of all characteristics that would render The Spirit human-like in any sense. We also unfortunately strip the Holy Spirit of the God-like qualities that the Father and the Son enjoy. So we are left with lifeless images like a wind or a flame or a dove. But this impoverishes the presence of God in us that we receive at Confirmation. The only advantage to this state of affairs is that it makes the Holy Spirit much more mysterious than the Father and the Son. Those images can also limit the concepts involved. The truth is that we can’t really talk about God in any glib way. St. Thomas Aquinas warns us that we can only say what God is not. ‘What God is’ is shrouded in mystery and is beyond our conceptions and images. The wordless and imageless state of expression in dealing with the third person of the Blessed Trinity is in a way therefore an advantage, as long as we don’t visualize a dove! That may be good shorthand, but may in the end obscure this powerful, wise and trusty person that enters us and brings us the Son and the Father.

If we are at a loss in understanding this, far more are we warned not to visualize the invisible lest we create an idol and not worship the living and mysterious God.

Posted in Msgr. Ferrarese, Pentecost | Leave a comment

How Far is Far Enough? by Monsignor Ferrarese

I was recently sitting with some longtime friends. They were from my first parish where I was a deacon. I have known them for over 40 years. As we often do when we get together, we talk about things in the Church and questions that the modern world asks. The topic of in-vitro fertilization came up ending with the question of why the Church is against it. One of my friends made an understandable comment: if a couple love one another, and this is the only way that they can have a baby, why is it morally wrong? One of my other friends mentioned the fact that often a number of embryos are formed, necessitating the selection of one of them and the destruction of the others. (One must remember that for a Catholic, the irrevocable creation of human life begins at conception—so that all the embryos have a right to life.)

The question then formed in my mind: how far can human beings go in the editing of the laws and facts of nature? If something can be done, should it be done? Mary Shelley, in her masterful novel “Frankenstein”, proposed this essential question as she gave us the story of the scientist that tried to bring life to the dead. It was a cautionary tale from the natural point of view.

But when a child is born through in-vitro fertilization, when surrogate mothers are successfully used in producing healthy babies, Shelley’s cautionary tale does not seem to hold.

The question still stands, not from the natural point of view (are we creating monsters?), but from a supernatural view (is this permissible to do?). The answer is partially solved by the evil of having to destroy multiple healthy embryos that can be clearly seen as objectionable. But what if there was only one embryo that is successfully implanted in the womb of its mother (semen and egg from the real father and mother, respectively)? The Church would still say that it is wrong to do it. Why?

We need to step back for a moment and look at how human beings have endeavored to rewrite biological truths and other natural processes for the benefit of humankind. There is the example of genetically altered foods like fruits and vegetables, and even experimentation on animals in all sorts of ways, including genetically. One must at this point make a further distinction: experimentation on animals is often painful to the creature. This is a separate moral issue that, of course, is important and needs to be debated. But the issue of experimentation or genetic manipulation that I am speaking about does not involve the issue of pain.

Because God has given to human beings the dominion (and the responsibility!) over all of creation, the Church has no problem over this genetic and biological experimentation of what is not human. But when one begins to use this same scientific freedom with the human person, then freedom becomes license; that is, an evil that no matter what good intentions there are in interfering in the being and development of a human person, it is against nature, against God’s law and therefore against God (sin). One must always guard against making a human person just another ‘thing’ that can be manipulated.

Therefore, the natural state of things, when dealing with humans, is ordained by God and must be respected and not interfered with. Therefore, because of the greatness of the human person made in the image and likeness of God, no interruption, change, addition or subtraction from natural processes is permissible even if it is theoretically possible to do. At the basis of this understanding is the teaching that the human being is not just part of creation, but is special: the overseer of creation. The human being cannot be the creator of himself or herself. Any change in God’s handiwork is considered questionable since it breaks with the Biblical narrative that defines the creation of humankind as ‘very’ good while the rest of nature was deemed just ‘good’. We are different than apes even if God chose to evolve human beings out of that particular genus of creation. Any attempt to equate the human person with other created beings flies in the face of the entire teaching of the Scriptures and, hence, of the tradition and Magisterium of the Church.

That manipulation of embryos, although done with the best intentions, is still morally evil since it interferes in God’s working with the human person, the crown jewel of creation.

The complexity of this issue becomes even more apparent as we delve into the area of the reconstruction of a person’s DNA. What if we can eliminate the gene that causes cancer? Would it be right to tamper with the building blocks of the human being? This leads us to a question which was asked at the start of the 20th century: What if we can design the “humans of the future?” One begins to see the possibilities and the moral dangers in this whole area of bio-ethics.

At this point, I must profess that I am in waters that are too deep for someone not versed in this area of moral theology. But I am glad of the Church’s caution and reliance on the Holy Spirit as a guide through this supposedly “brave new world.”

Posted in Msgr. Ferrarese | Leave a comment

Holy Leisure by Monsignor Ferrarese

One would think that the topic of leisure has no place in theological or spiritual reflection. It seems like something one does between periods of important work. At the very least, it is something that one reverts to when one needs a restorative period of refueling before one gets back to the important job at hand. It is a sort-of vacation (literally a sucking out, an emptying of destructive and exhausting forces that weaken and cripple one’s efforts). One often hears spoken words of honor for someone’s ‘work ethic’ but never for one’s ‘leisure ethic’!

But there has always been present in our scriptural consciousness a different perspective. When God created Adam and Eve he put them into a Garden of Delights where there was no shame and no work. Work was given to them as a punishment after the Fall. So what did they do all day? The answer strangely is ‘Pray and Play’.

By prayer we mean communication with God, that ongoing conversation we are called into from our disparate and mixed up lives. We read that God liked to walk in the Garden with Adam and Eve in the cool of the evening. What a beautiful image of prayer: a leisurely walk with God in the evening while the scent of the flowers and the fruits fill the air with their delicious fragrance! But they also must have spent the day enjoying the beauty of the garden and sharing with each other the joys of creation. We must not forget the limits of the story of Adam and Eve, since we are accustomed to lots of boredom-relieving activities that make the picture of our first parents seem the heights of ennui!

But we must see the basics of the story: when God created Adam and Eve and before the Fall from grace through sin, there was prayer and play: the life of loving God and loving each other through communication and delight.

The effects of sin were work, pain of birthing children and contentiousness (Cain and Abel). The exile from the Garden of Paradise ushered in sweat and toil. Gone were the days of prayer and play!

But not completely. God knit together underwear for them and still cared for human beings. God never abandons His creation. Even when it turns against Him He is ever ready to forgive and to rebuild.

Enshrined in subsequent revelatory commandments, God sought to keep Israel on the right path. With regard to our topic, he gave them the great gift of the Sabbath, establishing in the weekly order a day of holy leisure to be protected by His commandment to keep holy the Lord’s day. It is essential to see what honor this gives to play and leisure. It is not a waste of time; it is a consecration of time to God and his activity. The Sabbath rest is holy and makes sense of the other days of work and toil. It humanizes the rest. One would even go further and say that the Sabbath divinizes all activity by putting it firmly in the context of growing in the energy of Divine creative life.

This refraining from ‘servile’ work, that is, the work of servants, ennobles the human person and makes him an imitator of the Creator God who also used leisure to be able to admire the work of the other six days.

With the Incarnation of the Word (Logos) of God, even our work has become a way to God when it is properly understood in the Father’s plan.

All of this means that our leisure is meant to be a holy time: certainly to be experienced in tranquility and order, but also to be seen as a humanizing aspect of God’s plan, provided we do not make our leisure time an excuse for sloth and, even more nefariously, a time for sin.

Pets often are a wonderful way God reminds us of this. When I used to share my space and time with Siamese cats, they taught me to marvel at their beauty, their fidelity, their independence. I became a more loving and caring person due to their presence in my life. Those who have these feline or canine companions readily understand what I mean. Animals enjoy their leisure time and delight in our presence, giving us an example of how we need to spend all our time with God who delights in us and in our intelligence and free will, and accepts gratefully our fealty and service.

But with this difference: God does not just view us as another species without many of the advantages of divinity. Rather, He calls us ‘friends’ thereby bringing us into a strange and admittedly lopsided equality. He does this by slowly and gracefully revealing His image and likeness in us. We will never be Gods in the same way God is God, but we can mirror and resemble His beauty.

Holy leisure makes us appreciate the gift of living and provides the hope and peace that helps us surmount the many sufferings of life.

Posted in Msgr. Ferrarese | Leave a comment